The Divine Letters

At 62 years of age, Patrick Lerma whom has not ever married and whom, since August of 1968, has lived, for most of the time, in Reserve, New Mexico, knows that in art, it is a fact that abstract previews art. For example, if a small area of, for example a realistic painting is shown; it is seen as depicting abstraction. As far as writing, is concerned, an entire piece of writing is called a piece, because there is always something lacking in knowledge; therefore, an entire piece of writing doesn't have to be summarized or doesn't have to be itself a summary, in order to be called a piece.

On account that there is always something lacking in knowledge; therefore, it is, in actuality, ignorance, even though it is entire or complete.

Description, which is a discourse in literature, is to picture.

A gold brick melted and molded into a statue is valued more than when it was a gold brick, even though as a gold brick, it was invariably a work of art. The increased value is due to, inevitably information, which is not exclusive to a famous artist; in this case sculptor. The fact that gold, jewelry and particularly paintings "are" money, includes the reality of increased value,--and that reality conveys that information or description is more readily conveyed; rather than by the art, such as a picture, it is conveyed emphatically by writing,----even before it becomes literature,--or currency money, especially circulated paper money.

In The Divine Letters, you can weigh the written paper and it takes up space, while a thought cannot be weighed and takes up no space.

For writing to become literature, requires a reader. Letters are superfluously or needlessly to say, literature; superficially literature.

God knew beforehand that mankind would sin, but yet God created mankind, anyway. That's what God did. He also knew that forgiveness by mankind did not undo what he did. Therefore, in THE DIVINE LETTERS, God wanted repenting and/or forgiveness to sustain, which weren't necessary because God was forgiven by mankind; nonetheless, repenting and/or forgiveness sustaining were invariably emotional support, and they were to simply build and develop character, conduct, personality, and etc. God wanted one of his particular exemplifications of repenting and/or forgiveness to be a certain method, which was the reality of simply serving time in the civilized and domesticated method of prison. God chose a Halloween party as a perfect opportunity for him to anonymously exemplify serving time as costumed in a knight in shiny armor; which was, sort to speak, locked up, in the civilized and domesticated method.

God knew beforehand that mankind would sin, but yet God created mankind, anyway. Therefore, mankind's sins are forgiven. It is God's atonement to mankind. Therefore, the Crucifixion of Jesus didn't have to be. However, a reality that God whom created mankind, anyway, did was he conspired; he planned, the Crucifixion of his only son, Jesus. Mankind forgiving God for that, did not undo what God did. God's sustaining of his repenting through his son serving time nailed to the cross was a crime, because God was part of having not provided a decent life for Jesus. (The cause of crime: Crime results fundamentally from the society's failure to provide a decent life for everyone, and to develop a sense of social responsibility in its citizens.) God was part of the society. So anyway, God's sustaining of his repenting didn't have to be, because he was forgiven by mankind, but the forgiveness did not undo what God did; therefore, sustaining of repenting, which didn't have to be, because the forgiveness was granted; thus, the sustaining of repenting was simply to build and develop character, conduct, etc.----The sustaining of repenting and/or forgiving were or was to simply build and develop character, conduct, etc.

It was after God's two realities of what he did, that he anonymously attended the Halloween party.

The reality of crime in prison was absolutely absurd. Prison was just for serving time; therefore, it was obviously to be civilized and domesticated, or if it wasn't, then it was to be made civilized and domesticated.

God planned; conspired the Crucifixion of Jesus. Since God was not the actual murderers of Jesus; therefore, God was the omitted part of crime. (Crime is an act committed or omitted,--in violation of a law.) In this case, it violated humanity,--even though under the eyes of humanity, God, whereby Jesus said "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?" is not guilty.

________________________________________________

God, whereby there is his atonement to mankind; God's sustaining of his repenting through the Crucifixion of his son Jesus; God having been forgiven by mankind prior the Crucifixion; God having been forgiven for having created mankind; God's sustaining of his repenting, simply to build and develop character and conduct, etc.; that didn't have to be through the Crucifixion. The fact that forgiving God didn't undo what he did which was having created mankind; thus, God sustaining his repenting can continue, although it doesn't have to be through the Crucifixion; the sustaining of God's repenting is simply through the fact that God indulges into the reality of repenting over the fact that he knew beforehand that mankind would sin, but yet God created mankind, anyway. ----And mankind having forgiven God, did not undo what God did.